Adenosine Stress Testing In Pulmonary Hypertension |
|
2. 2009. McLaughlin VV, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 Expert Consensus Document on Pulmonary Hypertension: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association Developed in Collaboration With the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53; 1573-1619.
|
3. 2008. Park, MH. Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 71:205–213 (2008). (Division of Cardiology, Director of Pulmonary Vascular Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD)
|
4. 1992. Schrader BJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of adenosine and nifedipine in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992 Apr; 19(5): 1060-4. (Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois, Chicago)
|
5. 1992. GA Haywood GA, et al. Adenosine infusion for the reversal of pulmonary vasoconstriction in biventricular failure. A good test but a poor therapy. Circulation 1992; 86; 896-902. (Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.) “All patients received 30% oxygen via face mask throughout the study. Arterial oxygen saturations were measured at baseline and during drug infusions. Diamorphine 2.5 mg and diazemuls 2.5-5 mg were given intravenously to relax without markedly sedating the patient before right heart catheterization.” p. 897 “When hemodynamic parameters had remained stable over a period of 15 minutes, the drug infusion was administered via a fourth lumen in the pulmonary flotation catheter so that the drug was delivered into the right atrium. Hemodynamic measurements were repeated between 5 and 10 minutes after the start of the infusion, when steady-state hemodynamics had been reached. The duration of the adenosine infusion was between 10 and 15 minutes.” p.898 “In this study, the agent that resulted in the greatest fall in transpulmonary pressure gradient was adenosine 100 mcg/kg/min. This fall (35%) occurred as a result of a rise in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure that was not transmitted back across the pulmonary vasculature to result in an equivalent rise in mean pulmonary artery pressure. The mean value for pulmonary artery pressure was unchanged by the infusion of adenosine 100 mcg/kg/min.” p.899 [Please note: The patients in this study had biventricular failure.] “The mechanism by which intravenously infused adenosine acts selectively on the pulmonary circulation in these patients is not clear. The most likely explanation is that the very short half-life of adenosine (~10 sec) and the delayed transit time through the pulmonary circulation in patients with low cardiac index results in little adenosine reaching the systemic circulation.” p.900 Link to the PDF |
6. 2002. Scharf AM et al. Hemodynamic Characterization of Patients with Severe Emphysema. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002; 166:314-322. (Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, University of Maryland, Baltimore)
|
7. 2010. Silvestry, FE: Swan-Ganz catheterization: Interpretation of tracings. UpToDate. Last literature review version 18.1: January 2010 | This topic last updated: February 12, 2009. (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania) “The thermodilution method has been well-validated when compared with calculation of cardiac output using the Fick method. There are, however, several important sources of error:Tricuspid regurgitation — Tricuspid regurgitation leads to an attenuated peak and a prolonged washout phase of the temperature-time curve. This is due to cold injectate refluxing back into the vena cava, with resultant decreased pulmonary artery cooling (lowered peak) and delayed appearance of injectate that has moved retrograde into the vena cava and is then recirculated (prolonged washout). The net effect is an underestimation of cardiac output.” |
8. 1995. Bergstra A, et al. Assumed oxygen consumption based on calculation from dye dilution cardiac output: an improved formula. European Heart Journal (1995) 16, 698-703. (Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, University Hospital, Department of Medical Physiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands) “VO2 (assumed) = ((157.3 * BSA) + (10 * Sex) – (10.5 * LN Age) + 4.8) ml per min where BSA = body surface area, Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females, LN Age=the natural logarithm of the patient’s age. This formula was validated prospectively in 60 patients. A non-significant difference between VO2 (assumed) and VO2 (dye dilution) was found; mean 2.0 ±23.4 ml/min, P=0.771, 95% CI= - 4.0 to +8.0, LA –44.7 to +48.7. In conclusion, assumed oxygen consumption values, using our new formula, are in better agreement with the actual values than those found according to LaFarge and Miettinen's formulae.” p.698 Link to PubMed |
9.
2000. Steven Pon, M.D., Weill Medical College of Cornell University
(New York, New York) Web site. Determination of oxygen content in
blood. October 19, 2000. CaO2 = (1.36 * Hgb * (SaO2/100)) + (0.0031 * PaO2) The constant, 1.36, is the amount of oxygen (ml at 1 atmosphere) bound per gram of hemoglobin. The exact value of this constant varies from 1.34 to 1.39, depending on the reference and the way it is derived. The constant 0.0031 represents the amount of oxygen dissolved in plasma at 1 atmosphere. The dissolved oxygen term generally can be ignored, but becomes significant at high pressures -- as in a hyperbaric chamber. Where CaO2 = O2 content of blood, Hgb = hemoglobin in gm%, SaO2 = oxygen saturation of blood, PaO2 = oxygen tension of arterial blood in torr (e.g. PO2 = 98). Web Link |
10.
Dressler DK. Heart Transplantation: The Transplant Evaluation,
Medscape Today. Evaluation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is of particular importance, because patients with high PVR are at risk for acute right ventricular failure in the donor heart at the time of transplantation. The PVR is usually documented as the transpulmonary gradient (the difference between the mean pulmonary artery pressure and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) or as Wood units (the transpulmonary gradient divided by the cardiac output). A high PVR is considered to be a transpulmonary gradient greater than 12-15, or Wood units greater than 5. If PVR is high, vasodilators such as nitroprusside, nitroglycerin, prostaglandin E1, or inhaled nitric oxide may be administered to lower pulmonary pressures. Potential candidates with high PVR may benefit from a few days' infusion of positive inotropes and other agents along with hemodynamic monitoring with observation of PVR. |